Don't ask for advice, get good answers, then post google links countering those answers

Funny how so many here like the ZX2. Almost bought one but after reading this I am not sure anymore:

http://ohm-image.net/data/audio/rmaa-sony-nw-zx2-24-bit

And this:

ByWillon April 23, 2017

WARNING ABOUT SONY. I spent $1200 on the Sony Walkman NW-ZX2 when it came out in early 2015. It came with Android 4.2.2 and is still running 4.2.2. I have contacted Sony several times through many channels about upgrading the version of Android that the device is running but Sony absolutely refuses to upgrade Android on their own Walkman device. It's not like they don't have the knowledge; Sony has Android phones and tablets which they do update. They've just decided that those of us who spent the $1200 on the NW-ZX2 aren't worth the trouble. As Android advances and apps are adapted to the new versions of Android, app comparability is starting to become a problem. Get this: Sony's own Android app "Sony Music Center", which replaced Song Pal - which is no longer available - will not install on Android 4.2.2 showing error message " Your device isn't compatible with this version". It's Sony's own hardware and software! This new Walkman NW-WM1Z does not run on Android. It runs on proprietary software. That will limit your audio source choices and you still have no guarantee at all if you're going to get any firmware or software. Stay away from Sony's audio devices. They'll burn you. It's not worth it especially considering that the NW-WM1Z costs $3200. There are other brands and devices out there. You don't need Sony. Look elsewhere.

Great build quality, disappointing sound.
By nyceyes

This review is from: Sony NW-ZX2 128GB ZX2 High-Resolution Audio Walkman (Japanese Import) (Electronics)
Like 1-Star reviewer 'Cheonmin Sohn', I too am coming from a Cowon device - specifically the excellent and much less expensive Cowon J3 player. I tried to get better sound from this Sony device, and it just wasn't better. The tests I performed were methodical, used HD high end headphones from Audio Technica, used lossless FLAC tracks and, if anything, the results sounded inferior to the Cowon J3 (which, by the way, is known for it's JetEffect integrated audio technology). The CNET review on this Sony device did warn about it's lackluster power output. I ignored that review wanting to love this device, but they proved to be correct: Whereas I had to boost the software preamp level on this Sony device to help raise the power output level, I did not have to do that on the Cowon J3. The Sony's battery life leaves much to be desired, too ... a lesson I also learned the hard way because the CNET review pointed that out, too.

The only thing going for it IMHO is the absolutely stellar build quality and sturdy feel of the unit and its control buttons, and that it runs Android (albeit an older version). But that alone doesn't justify the steep price. It sounded on par with other players. Trust me folks - I tried many scenarios/tests, but my lowly (3 year old) $250.00 32 GB (expandable) Cowon J3 would not be denied (and that unit has stunning battery life, too).

So consider buying that or something along those price-point lines (from Cowon or others). You will get the same or better sound at a significantly better price point. Don't fall for the price and marketing hype. Learn from me. =. I hope this helps others.

 

Maybe. One thing I do keep reading that is true no doubt is the screen resolution is not the best. Even my cheap 10 year old HTC beats it. Sad.

 

This is a better review:

http://www.enjoythemusic.com/magazi..._Kern_AK240_Vs_Sony_NW_ZX2_Walkman_Review.htm

 

Yes I put my running shoes on and I'm running as fast as possible. Later I'll get into the car and drive away even faster.

 

Is this not a public site where we can share what we think or learn/ask or find and share about audio? Where does it say that in the forum rules we are not allowed to? What you may not think is relevant someone else may find relevant. Not everyone may have time to search Google, you assume a lot. You also negated to note I did also find a very positive review. I did state why I disagreed, the screen quality. Apparently you are not reading all post just skimming.

Your post does not reflect a "Super Best Audio Friends" more like a personal attack.

 

Hammer-time!

 

Yes, but with radically higher standards, and with better taste. the job of public site with almost no standards and no taste is already taken by another site you may have heard of.

 

Cussing and attacking is not a "better taste" nor should it be for this site or any public site including censoring and aggression.

 

@Hi-Fi

Careful now, you're treading on thin ground. You may wish take into account what @Marvey has to say. Also, the standard recommendation at this point is to just stop, step away from the keyboard, and leave things be. Otherwise you may not appreciate how things turn.

Speaking of rules, if you haven't done so already please check them out:
http://www.superbestaudiofriends.org/index.php?threads/must-read-for-new-members.3/

Taking some time to understand them, e.g. by reading the forums for the coming weeks without posting, will save you a world of trouble in these lands.

Good luck!

 

Thank you. Yeah who is breaking rule #1? "Try to be nice. Don't be an ass (1)? I don't believe I am.

 

You're not being an ass, you're being a sealion.

 

How does one unsubscribe from this site?

 

Your posts are annoying to read because you have been offered answers overwhelmingly in support of the ZX2, but you persist in trying to undermine those suggestions because you want to be told that, whatever you do, you should not buy the ZX2.

Whatever you do, do not buy the ZX2. It makes for a sub-par paring with the Andro. Buy the Hugo 2 instead.

 

Your post is annoying to read. I never said no one should not buy anything.

 

https://ianbrownlee.wordpress.com/2013/06/07/dealing-with-a-polarity-responder-mismatcher/

dunno why but hifi reminds me of certain HF sea lions...

 

Unsubscribed. Later.