Comments on Profile Post by Merrick

  1. Hrodulf
    Hrodulf
    Theoretically, the Freya S chain. The question is which will sound better.
    Jul 16, 2020
  2. monacelli
    monacelli
    In terms of measurements, Freya S in X1 mode is freaky transparent. It looks almost exactly like the passive path. Transformers, especially 10k:10k input transformers, will always have some bandwidth limitations (non-ideal phase in the bass, amplitude rolloff in the highs). Also, 10k input transformers have a highish output impedance which isn't ideal.
    Jul 16, 2020
    tommytakis and Merrick like this.
  3. monacelli
    monacelli
    Usually 1:1 600 ohm output transformers will have better specs (wider bandwidth, lower output impedance). BUT you need to be sure your DAC has a super beefy output stage that can happily drive 600 ohm loads. For Jensen, PI-2XR uses input transformers (10k), PO-2XR uses output transformers (600 ohm).
    Jul 16, 2020
  4. Merrick
    Merrick
    As I suspected, thanks. Guess a Freya S is the next thing I’m saving up for.
    Jul 16, 2020
    monacelli likes this.
  5. monacelli
    monacelli
    I would argue that the subjective side is equally important though. What is the best in theory might be different from what you like to listen to. Balanced audio can be kind of a rabbit hole. I kept it simple and ordered Freya S.
    Jul 16, 2020
  6. famish99
    famish99
    Depending on the DAC, the delta between balanced and SE outputs is overblown. Don't discount running SE out of the DAC into the rest of your chain.
    Jul 16, 2020
  7. Merrick
    Merrick
    Well I could either get a Jensen ISO (not the 600 ohm one because we know the Gungnir Multibit can’t output that) and then later get a Freya S and have spent more than I needed to, or I can live with the SE outputs on the Gungnir for now until a Freya S is in my budget. Might as well do the latter because the price of the ISO can be applied to the Freya.
    Jul 16, 2020
  8. famish99
    famish99
    Schiit stuff does benefit going to XLR, but it's still not like night and day. If you were going the trafo route, I'd say it depends on whether you care more about the mids or the bass, because they usually have better mids than SE at the cost of bass clarity.
    Jul 16, 2020
    monacelli likes this.
  9. Vtory
    Vtory
    Transparency is the term I'd avoid. Less harmonics introduced via active gains on measurement, but I found sonic changes greater with Freya than with 1:1 transformer. Good direction to me (although I am less against passive gains), but can't generalize too much.
    Jul 16, 2020
  10. Vtory
    Vtory
    My 2 cents: try SE for yourself to find our if you really bother balanced transmissions. If you want to commit more seriously, go for Freya(S). If not that much, then transformer may work more conservatively.
    Jul 16, 2020
    Merrick likes this.
  11. crenca
    crenca
    Question: The Freya S uses Nexus in 1:1 (or 1:4) to convert Bal to SE (so no consertion in passive mode) correct? I wonder how this is different (objectively and subjectively) to the summing used in the Gun MB A2's SE output...
    Jul 16, 2020
  12. crenca
    crenca
    @Merrick, after reading the Freya S thread I went with the Iso Max PI-2xr (the 10k consumer gear model) to go from Gun MB A2 Bal out to my amp (currently Asgard 3, soon to be Starlet). Subjectively I like it and don't hear any distortion/change in the bass, and I am probably too old to hear rolloff in the top octave.
    Jul 16, 2020
    Merrick likes this.
  13. Vtory
    Vtory
    @crenca Nexus doesn't simply sum. You may want to read again the chapters of Jotunheim (in the 'Schiit Happened") as nexus extended from the pivot(tm).
    Jul 16, 2020
    crenca likes this.
  14. Boops
    Boops
    FWIW I found going Gungnir Multibit → SE out → Goldpoint passive → SE amp to have an edge in transparency to Gungnir Multibit → Bal out → Freya S Nexus → SE amp. A small lvl 37 audiophile edge, but there.
    Jul 16, 2020
    Merrick likes this.
  15. Merrick
    Merrick
    Interesting, I hadn't considered a Goldpoint for the SE out. I already have the Saga, so for SE out straight from the Gungnir I'll just use that.
    Jul 16, 2020
    monacelli likes this.
  16. batriq
    batriq
    According to schiit GM A2's JFET section is "the same as Yggdrasil" and YA2 can drive 600ohm loads. I took that to mean GM A2 can drive 600ohm loads and was planning on building balanced-to-se 1:1 using WE111c's I have. Should I not do that?

    BTW, in speaker system, I have YA2 >balanced> Freya S >SE> amp, and love it.
    Jul 16, 2020
    monacelli likes this.
  17. Boops
    Boops
    For clarity’s sake, my GM is A1. Source was Mac laptop via Gen5 USB
    Jul 16, 2020
  18. monacelli
    monacelli
    @batriq My understanding is that Gungnir MB A1 could not drive 600 ohm loads. And Schiit doesn't mention that capability in the Gungnir MB A2 marketing info. I would ping Schiit support to confirm
    Jul 16, 2020
  19. Merrick
    Merrick
    @batriq I was referring to the A1 but I thought someone in the Gungnir thread confirmed it didn’t output 600 ohms on the A2? Definitely check with Schiit.
    Jul 16, 2020
  20. batriq
    batriq
    Thanks! Shot schiit an email. Will report back.
    Jul 16, 2020
    Merrick likes this.
  21. batriq
    batriq
    Response: "The gungnir has two SE outputs. This should be fine if you do, it just seems unnecessary." This, refers to 600ohm transformer load.
    Jul 18, 2020
    monacelli and Merrick like this.
  22. Merrick
    Merrick
    @batriq Sounds like a proper Schitty answer. Still, another reason for me to get the A2 upgrade down the line.
    Jul 18, 2020
    batriq likes this.