Merv's Politically Incorrect Audio Blog

@purr1n should I just do WSJ for all news or continue to use "free-news" like Drudge/The Hill/Politico.

I think issue is that I want to follow news for local stuff like NE FL related matters and State matters (where the FL GOP never fails to find new ways to screw my wallet). I RSS that shit so I can be informed.

News overload f'ing sucks. In other news, I need to see a SBAF Member in real life one day like maybe visit someone. I'm pretty fuzzy.

 

I stopped following all national news related sources online except Reuters and The Hill. I've been pleased with The Hill recently, especially the Rising show on YouTube that I watch clips of pretty regularly. Kim Iverson has been a breath of fresh air.

See: https://adfontesmedia.com/

 

Although I'm really only fluent in English, my Mandarin comprehension (amongst a few other languages) is marginally functional enough that I can confirm the translation is correct.

With that being said, what Marv said, he has no credibility OR he is very likely a higher level of psy ops / troll / wu mao (gov paid "commenter" that goes around trolling people, creating doubt, etc). I can also tell you my contacts in China I've briefly talked to about this stuff do want to get vaccines and not surprisingly, their own top level people got it first (which to me speaks louder than anything).

 

Been using allsides.com. It's useful to see some of the spin in action side-by-side

 

I always like The Hill since they do a good round-up of the news in DC. I should watch the Rising Show, but I watch too much junk.

Always look at the media bias chart, because most don't.

LOL, I'm more of a fan of Gorsuch if I have to be honest. Of course with the Tilt of the Court it comes back to them saying this fact over and over: Congress....do your job.

WSJ News has slight right-wing bias but it is nicely done. Opinions is a different story cause....Opinions.

NPR is also ok, but some of their news I think has that lean left stuff to it.

So I have Drudge Report being right but only due to how they display the links. I have the The Hill which is in the middle for me, and Politico is slightly left. I guess I'm doing good and going too far on one side.

 

There's only two on there that I take issue with. The Economist is a split personality (as perceived by us 'Murricans), because they're classical British "Liberal" (as opposed to American Christian Conservative, which is far from Laissez-Faire socially to compare, but mostly Laissez-Faire economically). And the Epoch Times news couches too much of their content from a Biblical perspective to keep away from a Judeo/Christian historical bias.

 

Ahhh yes, the Epoch Times & The Washington Times. Why these crazy AZNs gotta go cray cray on these news outlets? @purr1n knows what I'm talking about.

 

Paul is grilling dr Anthony Fauci. What do you think are his chances of getting anything from dr Anthony Fauci that is not a lie or has any meaning?

 

You are overlooking one thing: Looking good on the camera with soundbites from the Senator...great to get supporters to open up their wallets and donate to the Senator's PAC. End of the day: Feelings = $$$$

If the supporters were on the Senator's mailing list: You bet his "soundbites" were on the email asking people to give him $20 for the "cause."

 

That's not about political games anymore. With 800k infections in a day, two years of the pandemic, well Kim Iversen from Raising put it better than I ever can.
What has been happening for the last two years is not "evolving science" it is at best a complete failure, at worst, she is right, something that we could not even imagine possible in 21 century.

 

I don’t give a f**k who is right and who is wrong on this actually. Want I care about is who is making $$$ off the regular hairy bums like me. Last time I check Dr. Facui is loaded with $$$ and so is Senator Ryan, who is getting tons of donations from people who saw him on video looking cute on with that make up where they feel fuzzy inside and open up their wallets.

As usual, Goldwater was right on why bringing cameras to Congress was a shit idea. He even saw Male Senators started to use make up when they go on video back in the 80s.

Make Congress Great Again: Get more Cameras out of Congress.

 

I'll have you know I only damp orthos with my ass hair and that is more meta than meta itself.

 

That will let you gauge the magnitude of the lie we have been exposed to. The screen shot with the "excess deaths" 2020+three quarters of 2022, vs the deaths attributable to COVID only according to official UK data obtained under the Freedom of Information Act. The ugly truth about the COVID industry and two years of devastation it caused is starting to come out. And he goes in deils through all the numbers quarter by quarter if you care to watch it.
Here is the link to full video without taking too much space:

 

Freedom Freedom Freedom! Free to do what? Not have a clue about the statistics of demography and mortality. The only "lie" here is what you believe @wormcycle. I would say this is ASR level demography and analysis, but the truth is it does not even rise to that level.

Really @wormcycle , if your going to listen to morons you know what that makes you. By the way if you really want a clue you can go take a stat 101 course (combine it with a demography and mortality 101 for the win) at your local university...but of course that would take more effort than watching morons on Youtube.

 

I'm not getting into the specific video, but this really caught my eye from a distance.

ASR-Level is oh so, so true of so, so much of the rubbish about covid, and ASR-style is typical of its delivery too