Merv's Politically Incorrect Audio Blog

Discussion in 'SBAF Blogs' started by purr1n, Dec 26, 2018.

  1. Kernel Kurtz

    Kernel Kurtz Friend

    Pyrate Contributor
    Joined:
    May 19, 2018
    Likes Received:
    1,680
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    Winnipeg, Canada
    Hydrogen is going to find its market in long haul trucking, stationary backup generation, and possibly rail and aviation. As it becomes more available it may (or may not) trickle down to consumers. Toyota's Mirai has better range than most EVs, it is only the last of fueling infrastructure that makes it impractical, which is why they are mostly sold in places where they are testing H2 trucking and fueling is available. The biggest argument most people have with hydrogen is that it is mostly made by steam reforming natural gas. Electrolysis is inefficient, but if you can use otherwise wasted renewable energy (overproduction which is inherent in variable generation at times) it can be made to work eventually.

    Yes, even after the 2035 cutoff there are still going to be many millions of ICE cars on the road for decades to come. There will also always be people who prefer ICE cars and can afford expensive, inefficient fuel. For the same reason I prefer mechanical watches to digital ones, if technology allows me to drive a clean car with a nice engine I'll take that over a BEV any day.
     
  2. mediumroast

    mediumroast Facebook Friend

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2021
    Likes Received:
    104
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Location:
    EST
    The Japanese are investing heavily in hydrogen... Makes me think its probably worth it.


    I would not take any of the zero carbon technologies off the table.

    Luckily EU did not ban E fuels and is not going to. I mean what would happen to motosport otherwise..?
     
  3. Kernel Kurtz

    Kernel Kurtz Friend

    Pyrate Contributor
    Joined:
    May 19, 2018
    Likes Received:
    1,680
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    Winnipeg, Canada
    Formula One plans to start using e-fuels in 2026. Hopefully that means they will have a future as the current hybrid cars, because honestly Formula E is slow. Slower than Formula 3, with short races and no ground effects because they are limited by their batteries.

    Thanks to Germany and Italy who were the biggest advocates for the EU e-fuel exemption. Not surprising given that they also make the nicest cars (IMO).

    https://europe.autonews.com/environmentemissions/porsche-and-ferrari-center-e-fuel-debate
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agreed, ditto, +1 Agreed, ditto, +1 x 1
    • List
  4. Beefy

    Beefy Friend

    Pyrate
    Joined:
    Apr 10, 2021
    Likes Received:
    1,738
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    Canada
    The big reason that Japan is big on hydrogen is that they have considerable methane hydrate reserves off their coast. Amongst their dearth of domestic energy options, converting that to hydrogen fuel is extremely attractive. But that still isn't really zero carbon.

    Elsewhere in the world, hydrogen makes so little sense for the general public. The end-to-end efficiency is terrible, and building hydrogen storage and transport networks would be far more difficult and expensive than just bulking up electrical networks.
     
  5. Kernel Kurtz

    Kernel Kurtz Friend

    Pyrate Contributor
    Joined:
    May 19, 2018
    Likes Received:
    1,680
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    Winnipeg, Canada
    A lot of people think Toyota has missed the proverbial ball, but I think they are entirely right to go slow. They could have gone all in on EVs long ago, but they still have a huge market for their hybrids. That has given them lots of EE knowledge and they can (and are) jumping into full BEVs any time they want, but I'll bet their hybrids continue to sell huge numbers until the day comes they are banned. Likewise with hydrogen, they are hedging their bets dabbling in a technology that may never be dominant, but I would not be surprised if a day comes when they build H2/battery hybrids for all the people who are insecure about electrical access, because that is not going to change in my lifetime for sure.

    Toyota knows exactly what they are doing. They have all the plays covered, and are pretty much alone at that.
     
  6. penguins

    penguins Friend, formerly known as fp627

    Pyrate
    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2018
    Likes Received:
    3,451
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    SouthernCA
    I'm amazed people falling for this crap too. I guess I would like to imagine that a "more sophisticated" customer would be able to tell the different pretty easily... but nope. 90% of "luxury" vehicles I've been in or driven in the past 10 years I really don't feel like are worth it. I didn't feel the same up until about 2005-2008 for most vehicles. And I'm annoyed b/c the "good driving car" market is getting hit by this too with cars being made to be POS.

    Yep, I have a B58 powered BMW. Sadly - plot twist - it's not actually THAT fast or that powerful, but yes, it's definitely relatively low worry and does get decent gas mileage. As a matter of fact, I got the 240 over the M2 at the time of purchase because it had a B58 instead of the S55. New M2's have the S58 now, but really not digging how they look or the fact that they're still 3800+ lb (which is my biggest complaint with my car too).

    Golden age of gas power to me was 2000-2007/2010ish - though - exact dates depend on mfg and model. Tech was good enough to have sorted through most of the problems of the past but car weren't excessively electronic, dumbed down, etc. yet. In retrospect, I probably should have just got a half busted or POS level 2nd gen Honda Fit I could thrash and "drive a slow car fast" almost anywhere with the rest of the money going towards another "even more fun" than my current car... but this is the non-PC thread, not the car thread, so I'll stop.
     
    Last edited: Jun 2, 2023
  7. penguins

    penguins Friend, formerly known as fp627

    Pyrate
    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2018
    Likes Received:
    3,451
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    SouthernCA
    Back to the topic at hand:

    It was a bit of a stretch as a conspiracy, but I did want to see what everyone else was thinking. Too many things putting hard downwards pressure car prices for too long which made me wonder if it's at all possible something else may be going on.

    Personally, I agree - hydrogen may work in Japan where most things are packed closely together, you never really drive that far or that fast in a city, the cars are small on average and the transportation + other overhead costs for the fuel would be relatively cheap. Not so much for a lot of other countries.

    While I do personally believe in the idea of EVs for day to day around town stuff, I will be the first to say that I REALLY don't think it will work from a technical perspective for "everyone" nor do I like it from a personal perspective.
     
  8. yotacowboy

    yotacowboy McRibs Kind of Guy

    Pyrate Contributor
    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2016
    Likes Received:
    10,696
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    NOVA
    Home Page:
    That's the kicker with hydrogen, some regions/countries are well suited to adapt existing infrastructure, or have existing industry to support it through similar resource extraction and transport. So why not leverage that?

    Toyota would love to sell them cars.

    Here's another interesting tidbit. Toyota just started delivering the new Prius, you know, that car that was originally the butt of all the jokes about granola nuts, Greta-REEEEEES and incessant left-lane campers? Oh yeah, she's a looker now... But according to Toyota (yeah, yeah, marketing...), for every 1 BEV they could produce like the horrendous bZ4X, they can produce 90 Priuses or Priiii, or Priusi, or whatever. And of the Prius (optimus) Prime with it's conservative 8kwh pack, USDM is only going to see 10k units in 2024, and hopefully 15k units in 2025. We may love BIG BATTERY, but it just isn't sustainable at scale. What good is a car if the manufacturer can't wrangle the supply chain to build it? You folks do realize scarcity is precisely what shitty dealerships are counting on for absurd ADM and countless DIOs, right?
     
    Last edited: Jun 2, 2023
  9. Syzygy

    Syzygy Friend

    Pyrate
    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2018
    Likes Received:
    2,144
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    DFW, Texas
    What does someone with diarrhea and an electric car owner have in common?




    They both hope to get home in time.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • heart heart x 1
    • List
  10. YMO

    YMO Chief Fun Officer

    Pyrate Contributor
    Joined:
    Apr 1, 2018
    Likes Received:
    10,517
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Palms Of The Coasts, FL
    If I am in Dallas and I want to blow up a toilet, may I go to your house?
     
  11. mediumroast

    mediumroast Facebook Friend

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2021
    Likes Received:
    104
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Location:
    EST
    Big part of the reasoning for hydrogen are ships and planes, cars can be 1 / 3 of that.

    EU is still in a dead zone. An experienced American energy / oil market trader claimed that the Natural gas and oil infrastructure can't be used for hydrogen. Same guy claimed that LNG isn't going to be good for the continent in the long run. Kinda obvious right.

    The idea that hydrogen is going to "fix" anything here is same as thinking a copper wire laying on the floor provides energy.

    Outside of green hydrogen - fuel cells can work as more efficient natural gas micro power generators that are more efficient than gas turbines.. and I dont remember if the efficiency was higher than 60%. But still, if theres plenty of resources and excess energy it can be used to make power or hydrogen - energy dense fuel.

    ------
    At the end if the day the Free market is going to work this out. Few years ago the energy prices were too low for any investment worth having. Since the prices have risen, investment in energy is going to be more attractive again and so on.
     
    Last edited: Jun 3, 2023
  12. Mystic

    Mystic Mystique's Spiritual Advisor

    Pyrate Contributor
    Joined:
    Jan 28, 2016
    Likes Received:
    2,754
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    U.S.
    I am sick of this trend of bigger and heavier vehicles that weigh as much as a tank. With 3 second 0-60 times. People are f'ing stupid and have zero responsibility driving these killer monstrosities. Weight and size regulations for consumer vehicles needed to be reassessed 20 years ago.

    Karen doesn’t need a 5 ton electric Escalade to take her kids to soccer practice and run to Whole Foods. Kyle doesn’t need a 5 ton pickup truck to drive to his office job. When does it f'ing end? I guarantee more than 50% of these people can’t actually afford these vehicles.
     
  13. dasman66

    dasman66 Self proclaimed lazy ass - friend

    Pyrate Contributor
    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2018
    Likes Received:
    2,462
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    NW Pennsylvania
  14. penguins

    penguins Friend, formerly known as fp627

    Pyrate
    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2018
    Likes Received:
    3,451
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    SouthernCA
    To top it off, 99%+ of Karen and Kyles are not car people and already find it hard to recover when they start to lose slight control of a normal sized car, can't properly launch or stop a normal powered and weight car already, and will probably continue to buy cheap tires that make both of the above worse because "the other tires are $200 each and these are $35" (I've also seen several luxury car drivers do this... funny enough all of them emitted sleaze and you can tell only drive their car for the image and ego, not because they know how to drive or can appreciate actual luxury). This is just what I thought of in the few seconds it took me to read the first sentence of your post. I'm sure I can think of more.

    Have better things to do 99%+ of the time, but one day, I want to napkin math the numbers and see how much allowing these karen-mobiles to proliferate harms the environment vs just having most people continue to drive sedans and sports cars (so I guess the % of the population that didn't drive trucks pre-Ford Exploder) without even substituting hybrids or electrics into the equation. That and poorly programmed traffic lights.

    On the flip side, I am all for freedom of choice and I too will rent or borrow a large karen-mobile 1x every 2 weeks or for work - except I don't feel that hypocritical doing so because I typically fill the thing up with work related tools, materials, and supplies (as in I even have to put some of it in the passenger seat most of the time to fit everything).

    I don't blame Karen for the cost though - I think car companies know they can turn a $15k econo-box car in their lineup into the same econobox repackaged as a $35-45k suv simply because SUV. Make sure the sedans being replaced suck hard enough for long enough to justify these actions via poor sales to their hurr hurr I work for da gubamin EPA / similar auditors. I also suspect this is why GM is making an electric hummer that isn't viable or sustainable long term instead of a more practical and sensible EV platform. Unfortunately the consumer and environment continue to suffer for this.
     
  15. HHS

    HHS Almost "Made"

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2016
    Likes Received:
    252
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    United States
    The Hummer is on the GM BT1 platform, which is the EV platform for all of GM's body-on-frame EVs. So the platform would still exist, Hummer or no Hummer, because they're not gonna stop making pickups, Suburbans and Escalades. Packaging it as a Hummer is fairly trivial if they have a platform that works, so I suspect their market research just told them that the Hummer name had regained enough cachet (from people who were too young to know or have forgetten how crappy Hummers were) to be viable and profitable again. If it wasn't the Hummer it would just be another body-on-frame SUV, the segment is just too profitable to ignore.

    I do think manufacturers left sedans and compacts to flounder and fail in the US because emissions regulations and profits pushed them in that direction, but at the same time I think consumers met them halfway because in the US people genuinely prefer SUVs and trucks, and easy long-term loans made more expensive vehicles more approachable. Compounding that, there's less of an size penalty for EVs compared to ICE because battery size is a big factor in range, and smaller batteries in smaller cars will mean more range anxiety for consumers.
     
    Last edited: Jun 7, 2023
  16. purr1n

    purr1n Desire for betterer is endless.

    Staff Member Pyrate BWC
    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2015
    Likes Received:
    89,778
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Padre Island CC TX
    Less of a size penalty for SUVs when it comes to EVs because the of the body on frame approach. Slap the batteries into the frame or make a frame consisting of batteries. However the end result is even more MASSIVE weight penalty. People seem to forget that the electricity from EV has to come from somewhere, and that somewhere may not be a renewable source of energy. 99% of green people disgust me because they want buy a marketed solution (like every else in consumerist America) rather than be part of the solution to climate which would be conservation. Whether a 1.3L 3-cylinder turbo hybrid would be less polluting compared to a leased 6000-8000lbs electric SUV is not the point. It's the American mindset and our fat asses. The fact is, rich people pollute a lot more than less rich people. I could buy a C8, drop the headers, go catless, and I would still produce less pollutants than Arnold Swartzneggar and his fleet of custom electric Mercedes G Wagons and tens of thousands of square footage in his property ownings.

    The EV revolution in the USA will hit a wall at some point because of lack of chargers in the public space and long charge times. Right now EVs are red hot because it's a favored industry by government with its insane tax credits ($7500 from Uncle Sam for a Tesla 3). America is simply too spread out over long distances and plagued by NIMBY and lack of electrical transmission infrastructure. EVs will have their place in the cities - no doubt about this. Most people in Texas (a big state geographically) will be using petroleum for a long time to come. At a certain point when oil starts to get too pricey, we will switch to E85 or E100. Indy car has been a testbed for E100 in the past few years. Many new ICE autos will take E85. Besides, the alcohol fuel thing works for farming, a perennial protected industry in the USA. Add hybrid to that to reduce pollutants because burning alcohol still produces CO2.

    FYI, while EVs are the in-thang, there are a ton of plug-in hybrids on the street, and growing. Toyota may prove to have had the right idea in the first place.
     
    • Like Like x 3
    • Agreed, ditto, +1 Agreed, ditto, +1 x 1
    • List
    Last edited: Jun 7, 2023
  17. Kernel Kurtz

    Kernel Kurtz Friend

    Pyrate Contributor
    Joined:
    May 19, 2018
    Likes Received:
    1,680
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    Winnipeg, Canada
  18. dasman66

    dasman66 Self proclaimed lazy ass - friend

    Pyrate Contributor
    Joined:
    Mar 13, 2018
    Likes Received:
    2,462
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    NW Pennsylvania
    I have a 4WD truck (for hauling), my wife has an AWD SUV (older Highlander (2008) - she needs the space for work) and I have an AWD sedan (Volvo)... a typical winter for us is 200+ inches of the white stuff. All of the cars are fitted with snow tires in the winter. The best performing winter vehicle is the sedan... by far. The only time the truck/SUV outperform it is if we have more than 12" of fresh white stuff that hasn't been plowed yet... so that's maybe 1-2x a winter.

    People who claim they need a truck or SUV to drive in the winter either have never driven a properly equipped vehicle, or don't know how to drive in the winter. Probably both.

    The majority of the people have big SUV's/trucks for the same reason they live in McMansion's... conspicuous consumption/bigger dick syndrome.
    ----edit-----
    that was a great article
     
    • Like Like x 5
    • Agreed, ditto, +1 Agreed, ditto, +1 x 1
    • List
    Last edited: Jun 10, 2023
  19. purr1n

    purr1n Desire for betterer is endless.

    Staff Member Pyrate BWC
    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2015
    Likes Received:
    89,778
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Padre Island CC TX
    ^ so true after living in Michigan for 8 years. The higher center of gravity of SUV doesn't help on slippery roads. Best to have sedan or wagon with AWD. Better to use the snow plow to move snow if the city hasn't gotten to it in time.
     
    • Agreed, ditto, +1 Agreed, ditto, +1 x 1
    • List
  20. bobboxbody

    bobboxbody Friend

    Pyrate BWC Contributor
    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2016
    Likes Received:
    1,465
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    GR, MI
    Can confirm currently living in Michigan, drove by more than a few flipped over SUV's this winter. My 2014 Prius C did great. Combination of short wheel base, thin tires, and low slung heavy-ish battery/low center of gravity makes for great snow stability.
     
    • Agreed, ditto, +1 Agreed, ditto, +1 x 1
    • List

Share This Page