Antdroid and Sajid Amit are both great. Josh Mound is amazing. Many reviewers I know that are known either are paid by a website that sells headphones and have an agenda, want to sell their name for branding etc etc, or have an agenda to just get the most clicks possible, sell stuff via affiliate links etc etc. True content without bias is hard to come by. Some of that content is great as well, varying by purpose.
I should add that a lot of the issue for me is the lack of disclaimer, if reviewers that had a conflicting bias gave honest forward disclaimers, for me it would negate many issues. Those of us who measure, and watch certain various sites measurements, know that measurements can vary and be portrayed towards a bias very easily.
It's not like SBAF is unbiased. A lot of the people here though are very open and honest about their biases (which is very important; means you can get a lot of information from their writing whether positive or negative).
Yeah you're right, we're all biased, such is life! It's just about that self realization so the reader/watcher/listener can get in on the context and story of the content. If I'm watching CNN or Fox, I know where they are coming from. SBAF is good at that...usually!
Exactly, as long as you know where they are coming from will the information they are presenting can be useful in one form or another. Actually, I want to put this into an actual post somehow so in the future something like this doesn't get lost. Hmm..
I carefully check out whatever Andrew ([email protected]), WaveTheory (YT), Sajid Amit (HF), or Sandu Vitalie (Soundnews) reviewed. They're all biased in their own ways. But all of them make good points to me. number1sixerfan (HF) also creates good and interesting content. Bottomline is to read anything on the internet critically.
Read these "rules" AND introduce
yourself before your first post
Being true to what the artists intended
(opinion / entertainment piece)
Comments on Profile Post by insidious meme