Massdrop x E-MU Purpleheart Measurements

Discussion in 'Headphone Measurements' started by Marvey, Dec 18, 2016.

  1. Marvey

    Marvey Loves sex and records

    Staff Member Friend Banned
    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2015
    Likes Received:
    22,976
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Calabasas, CA
    I'm late to the game on this one, so I'll provide the following references below, and only limited commentary. Tyll reviewed the Walnut version. I am not sure if there are significant differences between the Walnut and Purpleheart version here. I would not say these are a baby TH-X00 Purplehearts because there are some differences, despite both headphones having a bassier nature.

    See @Hands Formal Review: http://www.superbestaudiofriends.or...heart-headphone-review-and-measurements.3511/
    And Tyll's Formal Review (Walnut Version):
    http://www.innerfidelity.com/content/e-mu-walnut-creative-aurvana-live-woodied-measurements#KQ17yzi7x5zSsQu9.97

    The E-MU Purpleheart is a supra-aural headphone with the pads lying on the ears. It's lightweight and perfect for travelling or more casual use. And Massdrop does it again with nut-so pricing at $75, see here: https://www.massdrop.com/buy/massdrop-x-e-mu-purpleheart

    The sound is bassy, warm, and lush. Midrange is a bit recessed and treble seems smooth with the exception of one tiny peak reminiscent of the TH-900s sharp sound, but to a much smaller extent. The bassy nature of the headphone also tends to mask any irregularities with the treble. The tuning can probably be said to be more consumer friendly and in more accordance to headphones found at the big-box stores. I've been told that these use bio-cellulose drivers, and it certainly does sound that way with timbral similarities to the Creative Aurvana Live and the AudioQuest Nighthawk, or even the legendary Sony R10 headphone of yesteryear. I love the sound of bio-cellulose drivers BTW. What I found most compelling with this implementation was how well the treble was tamed.

    Massdrop x E-MU Purpleheart Frequency Response
    Massdrop x E-MU Purpleheart Frequency Response.png
    Despite being a supra-aural with comfy pads that rest on the ear, the L and R channel matching is very good, maybe even exceptional considering the circumstances. We see a small peak around 7kHz which explains the slight bit of sharpness, but really in the overall scheme of things we are bit-picking. There are $1400 headphones with much worse behavior.

    Massdrop x E-MU Purpleheart CSD
    EMU PH L.jpg
    EMU PH R.jpg
    Nothing (bad) stands out in the CSDs. There are no long lived ridges that extend from the top of the bottom. No ear-piercing behaviors. The decay is actually pretty fast and clean for what is typically seen for a closed headphone.

    Frequency Response of E-MU Purpleheart Compared to Fostex TH-X00 Purpleheart
    E-MU Purpleheart vs. Fostex TH-X00 FR.png
    Green = Fostex TH-X00 Purpleheart
    Purple = E-MU Purpleheart

    Frequency Response of E-MU Purpleheart Compared to AudioQuest Nighthawk
    E-MU Purpleheart vs. AudioQuest Nighthawk FR.png
    Green = AudioQuest Nighthawk
    Purple = E-MU Purpleheart

    Despite the Nighthawk having some great characteristics such as low distortion, speed, and resolution, I would never quite get over its screwy tonal balance. I know a lot of members here who could never quite get over how the Nighthawk was tuned and couldn't hear past its frequency response to hear how good its technicalities were. As we can see here, the E-MU Purpleheart, although a bassy headphone by audiophile standards, does it's thing just right. It's not as technically proficient as the Nighthawk, but unlike the Nighthawk, the midrange isn't overly recessed, nor is the bass overly bloated. Not seen here, but I also found the 9kHz treble peak of the Nighthawk much more difficult.

     
    Last edited: Dec 18, 2016
    kittenuwu, anetode, Chuck and 2 others like this.

  2. Serious

    Serious Friend

    Friend
    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2015
    Likes Received:
    900
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    Munich
    Interesting how your measurements look so nice, but Hands' measurements look very bassy - almost 10db from 1kHz to 100Hz. Maybe a better seal would've been more realistic?
     
  3. Marvey

    Marvey Loves sex and records

    Staff Member Friend Banned
    Joined:
    Sep 24, 2015
    Likes Received:
    22,976
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Calabasas, CA
    No. This is exactly how I hear it with the pads resting on my ears. If it were Nighthawk bass, I would have immediately texted Christian and asked him WTF did he send me these things? I just provided AudioQuest Nighthawk frequency response for comparison. They do have more mid and upper bass than TH-X00s though. There is still a good 7db rise from the mids to 100Hz. The Y-axis on @Hands plot is more compressed, making differences look larger than the plot here.
     
    Last edited: Dec 18, 2016
  4. cskippy

    cskippy Friend

    Friend
    Joined:
    Oct 14, 2015
    Likes Received:
    768
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    Tempe, Arizona
    Oh these look tasty for a portable cheap headphone. @Marvey do you have distortion measurements? Also, what are your thoughts on modding potential, a little acoustic fiber and dynamat in the rear?

    Edit: I suppose @Hands already provided what I'm asking for.
     
  5. Hands

    Hands Overzealous Auto Flusher - Measurbator

    Staff Member Friend
    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2015
    Likes Received:
    3,936
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Colorado
    Home Page:
    Yep, some strategic dynamat, a wee bit of damping in cups, and front damping to slightly round out any top end edges, if you so choose, and you might be surprised.
     
  6. Hands

    Hands Overzealous Auto Flusher - Measurbator

    Staff Member Friend
    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2015
    Likes Received:
    3,936
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Colorado
    Home Page:
    Well, the Nighthawk didn't sound particularly bassy to me, so much as it sounded like it had a giant, steaming crater of annihilation where the whole midrange was suppose to be. Funny how things work out like that. All relative, even down to where you line up the plots on the x-axis.

    I think the PHs are a little less bassy than they appear in measurements, probably because you never get a totally perfect seal with them, and the distortion makes them sound a bit less powerful than they would otherwise. Just a guess. And measurements can be tricky.
     
  7. Roarke

    Roarke Rando

    Joined:
    Nov 10, 2016
    Likes Received:
    2
    Trophy Points:
    3
    Location:
    Orange County
    ... wow! Probably a bit of distortion but that FR graph is insanely flat for under $100!
     
  8. loplop

    loplop Acquaintance

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2016
    Likes Received:
    35
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Location:
    Ohio
    I bought a pair of these. I'm curious to compare them to my Thinksound ON2's, my current favrorite cheapie (not that I've heard 'em all...)

    Too bad we won't get them until I completely forget that I even bought them. I suspect they'll show up one day and I'll have to come back here to remember. :p
     
  9. Decomo

    Decomo Facebook Friend

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2016
    Likes Received:
    71
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location:
    Australia
    Keen to hear your impression against Thinksound ON2. I was keen to join the drop of ON2 but could not find much impression and how it compares like Emu Walnut or Purpleheart...
     
  10. loplop

    loplop Acquaintance

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2016
    Likes Received:
    35
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Location:
    Ohio
    I like the Thinksound ON2 a lot, @Decomo . I started tapping a more detailed response, but it deserves a bit more fleshing out, and probably should be posted as a separate thread. If you're interested in more details, I can take the time to polish it up and post.

    If you just want the TL/DR: They're worth buying, and are quite fun to listen to.
     
    Decomo likes this.
  11. loplop

    loplop Acquaintance

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2016
    Likes Received:
    35
    Trophy Points:
    18
    Location:
    Ohio
    Did you ever get a pair of the ON2's, @Decomo ?

    I still enjoy mine and use them quite a lot. I'm curious to try the ON2's vs the E-MU Purpleheart's. I'm hoping those drop before a long vacation to Europe I have planned. Will certainly be taking one of the two with me.
     
    Decomo likes this.
  12. zerodeefex

    zerodeefex Ornery Admin

    Staff Member Friend
    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2015
    Likes Received:
    4,687
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Okay, these sound damn good for $75. Well done @CEE TEE
     
    landroni, MattRG, Hands and 1 other person like this.
  13. MattRG

    MattRG Almost "Made"

    Contributor
    Joined:
    Jan 11, 2017
    Likes Received:
    210
    Trophy Points:
    43
    Location:
    Taylorsville, Georgia - USA
    My thoughts exactly. They have most of the goodness of the $399 TH-X00 but in a portable, lightweight form. I am going to get a lot of use out of these.
     
    Decomo and CEE TEE like this.
  14. Decomo

    Decomo Facebook Friend

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2016
    Likes Received:
    71
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location:
    Australia
    Great to know. Keen to try one but it is not dropping again unlike TH-X00 which is dropping regularly..
     
  15. Decomo

    Decomo Facebook Friend

    Joined:
    Jul 1, 2016
    Likes Received:
    71
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location:
    Australia
    My apology for late response. I somehow did not get notification. I did not get ON2 because I opted for over ear for more comfort. I got B&O H6 2nd Gen instead and quite happy with it for portable usage...
     

Share This Page