A case to be made for standalone PEQ (e.g. MiniDSP Flex) for headphone setup?

Discussion in 'General Audio Discussion' started by HeyWaj10, Sep 8, 2023.

  1. HeyWaj10

    HeyWaj10 Almost "Made"

    Contributor
    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2022
    Likes Received:
    253
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    Cary, NC
    After a lot of searching, it's been rare to see people using external/standalone PEQ devices (of which there aren't many options) in their headphone chains. Typically, PEQ is done via computer as the primary source for a system. This makes sense 90+% of the time (as it does for me currently). However, what if there was the desire to still incorporate PEQ into the chain where multiple sources are used?

    Case in point, I have a CD player (used as a transport) and I stream music as well. I also have LCD-X's that require PEQ to sound their best. As a result, I essentially don't even use my "transport" and simply listen to those albums I have on CD via streaming instead. I still have the enjoyment, but lose out on my desire to still spin some CDs.

    As far as I'm aware, there are really 2 options out there to fill this gap for external PEQ to apply to multiple input sources: MiniDSP Flex (digital version) and RME ADI-2 DAC FS. From my perspective, the MiniDSP Flex offers far more PEQ capability while also allowing me to use my DAC flavor of choice - all while costing less than half of the ADI-2, which would be far more limiting and force me to use the internal DAC (which I may or may not truly enjoy).

    Maybe I'm overthinking this all, but it's been circling around in my brain for quite some time, and seeing as many headphones out there do benefit from EQing to sound better than in stock form, I do see a case for this type of configuration. I don't love the idea of more boxes, cables, etc. but it's an intriguing concept to cover all the bases. A bonus idea with the MiniDSP Flex, as well, is the analog input that could be used if/when I wish to dabble in vinyl. Appreciate your thoughts!
     
  2. yotacowboy

    yotacowboy McRibs Kind of Guy

    Pyrate Contributor
    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2016
    Likes Received:
    10,904
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    NOVA
    Home Page:
    I think the need to PEQ system-wide has a few other factors: headphones or speakers, or both? EQ to match subjective preferences or to match a house or target curve? How much phase/time domain nervousa do you have?

    if you’re eq-ing headphones to subjective preference, I don’t see the need for anything more than an analog EQ like Loki or Lokius. If you’re trying to EQ a multichannel speaker rig and incorporate multiple subs, then PEQ alone isn’t enough; a full on room correction tool like Dirac is probably necessary.
     
  3. HeyWaj10

    HeyWaj10 Almost "Made"

    Contributor
    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2022
    Likes Received:
    253
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    Cary, NC
    Great question - I would say "limited" nervosa, and with headphones only (for several years, likely). I really just want to EQ to personal tastes/target curve.

    I highly considered the hardware options, like Lokius. However, the frequency adjustments (and relative Q factor) on those devices is limited and may not address the specific "issues" within a given headphones FR, right? For example, my LCD-X have a huge 7bB dip around 4kHz. With something like Lokius, I don't think the 2kHz band would address that dip adequately to bring the presence region back into preference - or am I misinterpreting Lokius' capability?
     
  4. Riotvan

    Riotvan Snoofer in the Woofer

    Pyrate
    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2015
    Likes Received:
    4,222
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    I use a minidsp shd studio for this and other purposes, mostly it's been great. One profile for the speakers with Dirac, two for headphones and one for flat. And there lies the problem: i need more I have way too many headphones.

    Was recently thinking of adding some analog eq on top for some quick and dirty settings. Still undecided on that one...
     
  5. yotacowboy

    yotacowboy McRibs Kind of Guy

    Pyrate Contributor
    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2016
    Likes Received:
    10,904
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    NOVA
    Home Page:
    I’m speaking generally so this may be applicable to more folks, but if you’re looking to EQ based on sharp peaks or troughs based on the measured response of any particular headphone, then PEQ is going to be the only simple solution. If you’re looking to “correct” a response to match a target curve, it may be a little more involved. I’m not convinced using a convolution filter can cause any one headphone to sound like another, but there are certainly some who believe such and will be happy to sell you software and or hardware solutions to do just that.
     
  6. HeyWaj10

    HeyWaj10 Almost "Made"

    Contributor
    Joined:
    Jan 10, 2022
    Likes Received:
    253
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    Cary, NC
    So is the MiniDSP limited to only 4 EQ profiles? Yeesh, that's a limitation I didn't consider.
     
  7. Riotvan

    Riotvan Snoofer in the Woofer

    Pyrate
    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2015
    Likes Received:
    4,222
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    The Netherlands
    The studio is at least. I have no idea about others. There is a good backup and restore function for profiles though.
     
  8. AlPastor

    AlPastor Facebook Friend

    Contributor
    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2023
    Likes Received:
    143
    Trophy Points:
    33
    Location:
    The Woodlands
    I really wish there was a Lokius+ with adjustable frequency and Q. I think it would give you exactly what you need in analog form. But now we're talking 18 knobs (or triple nested lol) vs 6 and more $$$.
     

Share This Page