Monitor Field Trip to Guitar Center

Discussion in 'Speakers' started by ultrabike, Jul 21, 2016.

  1. ultrabike

    ultrabike Measurbator - Admin

    Staff Member Pyrate MZR
    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2015
    Likes Received:
    8,994
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Irvine CA
    Nevermind, I can apply the calibration to the measured files (EDIT: Previous post have been updated with calibration applied). Not much of a difference IMO:

    LSR305 No Calibration - Blue
    LSR305 Calibration Applied - Red

    Calibration_test_2.png

    Possible the GC listening room impacts the monitors tone. I know my MR5s sound good with 0 dB HF in my living room, but need -2 dB HF on my bedroom... Dunno. At GC, the LSR305s did sound a bit hot (not annoyingly so though).
     
    Last edited: Jul 25, 2016
  2. ultrabike

    ultrabike Measurbator - Admin

    Staff Member Pyrate MZR
    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2015
    Likes Received:
    8,994
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Irvine CA
    Compensated all plots, and changed dBSPL scale. Sorry about any confusion. Hope these plots and brief impressions are useful.
     
  3. Hrodulf

    Hrodulf Prohibited from acting as an MOT until year 2050

    Pyrate
    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2015
    Likes Received:
    4,393
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Is it me or are these more alike than different?

    We measured five different monitors and what we came to was that the room impacted the sound more than the actual speakers. Especially below Schroeder frequency.

    Five speakers, same room.

    [​IMG]

    One speaker (Yammy HS5), six rooms.

    [​IMG]
     
  4. Thad E Ginathom

    Thad E Ginathom Friend

    Pyrate
    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2015
    Likes Received:
    15,371
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    India
    Very interesting. People are always on about the effect of rooms on sound, and I don't have a problem with what they say, but it is not often that one sees a comparative room test rather than a speaker test.
     
  5. ultrabike

    ultrabike Measurbator - Admin

    Staff Member Pyrate MZR
    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2015
    Likes Received:
    8,994
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Irvine CA
    Yes, room does seem to affect things up a bit.

    There are differences between the monitors of course, but...

    [​IMG]

    That said, most of the big issues seem to be in the bass, sub-bass, and perhaps low mids. A small room also creates a somewhat "noisy" response probably due to reflections. If I apply the -2 dB on my MR5s I almost don't absolutely need to do much on the mids and treble.

    The cheapo miniDSP 2x4 however only includes parametric equalizers and programmable crossovers (IIRs). The more expensive miniDSP stuff includes more powerful FIRs. BTW most analog passive crossover are effectively IIRs I think.

    If I ever go crazy high end, I might consider DIY 3-way or 2.5-way speakers (stupid expensive drivers), with active crossover using a set of high-end miniDSP boxes in the mix and some dedicated driver amplifiers. If using a computer, add a Sonarworks solution to handle fine tuning.

    It still not going to be perfect though. Room issues are a 3-D affair me thinks. But I bet things will be awesome.
     
  6. ultrabike

    ultrabike Measurbator - Admin

    Staff Member Pyrate MZR
    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2015
    Likes Received:
    8,994
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Irvine CA
    BTW, even in sub-optimal rooms, and with their relative limited low end extension, 5" entry level monitors hold their own well against headphones:

    http://www.superbestaudiofriends.or...-field-trip-to-guitar-center.2484/#post-65296

    This is somewhat surprising to me, specially with full size headphones, considering headphones don't have to deal with room interactions.

    I maybe looking at things wrong but, it's almost as if upper mids and treble are better with certain monitors, and lower mids and bass are better with certain headphones. I think most of the soundstage and cross-channel information is in the mids and treble too.
     
  7. Thad E Ginathom

    Thad E Ginathom Friend

    Pyrate
    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2015
    Likes Received:
    15,371
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    India
    When I visited London last year, it was without a debt repayment that was waaay overdue and had been really-really-this-time promised. Had wondered about going to studio shop and listening to a pair of Geithain RL906 for the desktop. Might have brought them home too. And, you know... even with the subsequent hearing loss, I'd still get huge pride-of-ownership just looking at the things!

    But it wasn't to be, and I had a great trip without going near any audio shops at all.

    And when the money did come back, it was just in time for real-emergency flood spending. So I guess stuff worked out.


    .
     
  8. Rex Aeterna

    Rex Aeterna Friend

    Pyrate
    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2015
    Likes Received:
    212
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    Cinnaminson, nj
    there is some other things to consider with rooms. it's not just frequency you look at. you got decay time and comb filtering issues that can occur depending on environment and speaker. highs are very easy to take care of. with mids to lower mids being not too much issues either but, more than highs and of course from around 200hz and below is always a nightmare in lot of rooms in most cases... it's not just room size alone too, you have to think about floor,wall and ceiling materials that was used as well and if there is any insulation used or not. i think sheet rock with drywall still is one of best wall types and with insulation behind it you have mostly pretty much lot of the range dampened pretty darn well without treatment. you got other things like ambient room temperature and humidity levels to calculate too but, that's down farther into the rabbit hole most people will ever attempt to bother with.....but, while sounds complex, it's not really all that hard. rooms can even be tuned by ear if know what you're looking for.
     
  9. ultrabike

    ultrabike Measurbator - Admin

    Staff Member Pyrate MZR
    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2015
    Likes Received:
    8,994
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Irvine CA
    I think decay may be seen in the frequency response. It's perhaps not very obvious though. Comb-filtering can also be seen in the frequency response, just not the smoothed out one.

    Materials and environment conditions are perhaps other considerations, but difficult to take care off practically.
     
    Last edited: Jul 23, 2016
  10. Rex Aeterna

    Rex Aeterna Friend

    Pyrate
    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2015
    Likes Received:
    212
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Location:
    Cinnaminson, nj

    probably but, i am not an expert on measuring stuff. i only know how to read the stuff. i know with headphones it showed in the frequency response on decay issues due to peaks being disguised as a dip and so forth so it is possible.
     
  11. Hrodulf

    Hrodulf Prohibited from acting as an MOT until year 2050

    Pyrate
    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2015
    Likes Received:
    4,393
    Trophy Points:
    113
    They just released this - https://www.minidsp.com/products/minidsp-in-a-box/minidsp-2x4-hd

    It does FIR processing and our software guys made a utility which can poop out a file for the Minidsp the understand. The DACs on this unit are decent, but ultimately you'd need a SHARC processor with better DACs at the end.

    As both of my Equator Q12 speakers have their own AD/DA chains, I'm not sweating on the DAC too much. Here's what I got with some IIR filtering from the Minidsp 2x4HD.

    [​IMG]

    The curve still needs some licking and bass needs some attention positioning wise, but AFR is better than 90% of the studios I've seen. Rex is right about the time domain effects - my room doesn't sound perfect. It needs treatment for that.
     
  12. ultrabike

    ultrabike Measurbator - Admin

    Staff Member Pyrate MZR
    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2015
    Likes Received:
    8,994
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Irvine CA
    Yes. I have their cheapo deal-io $100 one, but the new box is very attractive. It does have a 400 MHz 32/40-bit processor (ADSP21489) according to their site. Full FIR support!

    Furthermore, it supports 2 Vrms outputs instead of just 0.9 Vrms. And this new one can do 192 kHz audio streaming through TOSLINK and USB, w ASIO support. In the earlier unit I have, USB is only for control, not for streaming. The damn thing now even support IR remote for volume control, input selection and so forth. It is a very attractive solution. Specially if one wants to do a high end DIY three/four-way reference/programmable speaker with stupid expensive drivers (More$l, $can$peak, $ea$...)

    Side Note: As far as FIR vs IIR. I feel IIR is much more powerful than FIR assuming the two are same order. In fact, a FIR is a digital filter with only feedforward and no-feedback processing. IIRs have both feedforward and feedback processing. The deal is that a biquad is a 2nd order IIR filter (one of many such IIR configurations possible). One can cascade a number of biquads and get an equivalent higher order IIR filter, but not necessarily crazy high. A FIR such as the one Schiit is using is about 18000 order. One could create a programmable 18000 order IIR that would likely kick the living shit of any FIR of similar order, because it can be configured to behave as an FIR among other very crazy things. Also, most analog front ends don't go past the equivalent of 7th order IIRs, because otherwise they can go unstable due to component tolerances. In digital they can go higher, but not crazy much, because otherwise they can go unstable due to arithmetic precision limitations (try designing a 100th order Butterworth - one may start juggling with different structures to keep things from blowing up). That said one can have high order on the zeros (FIR) and low on the poles (feedback) and do awesome shit... Anyhow, it's just a side note. Feel free to ignore.
     
    Last edited: Jul 24, 2016
  13. ultrabike

    ultrabike Measurbator - Admin

    Staff Member Pyrate MZR
    Joined:
    Sep 25, 2015
    Likes Received:
    8,994
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    Irvine CA
    Just read they offer this not so cheap upgrade for the 2x4HD also:

    https://www.minidsp.com/products/dirac-series/2x4hd-to-ddrc-24

    And this alternative version of the gadget:

    https://www.minidsp.com/products/dirac-series/ddrc-24

    I don't know what 24-bit ADC and DAC they are using. Possible it's the AD1939?

    Re-read a few times after reading the miniDSP site. This is very awesome!
     
    Last edited: Jul 24, 2016
  14. Hrodulf

    Hrodulf Prohibited from acting as an MOT until year 2050

    Pyrate
    Joined:
    Sep 28, 2015
    Likes Received:
    4,393
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Well, I'd keep it as a cool box for designing loudspeakers. If you're swinging for big buck driver then I'd use this - https://www.minidsp.com/products/minidspkits/minisharc-kit

    And strap two Soekris DACs at the end complete with a Curryman DAC for bass.
     
  15. roshambo123

    roshambo123 Friend

    Pyrate Contributor
    Joined:
    May 26, 2018
    Likes Received:
    3,648
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    [​IMG]


    Visited Guitar Center's Studio Monitor listening room in Redondo Beach today and did some impressions.

    In general, the larger speaker diameters had smoother tone, better cohesion, and more bass, but not always as much as I'd expect. Additionally, I didn't check EQ on every monitor, some were flat, some were not, others I adjusted myself. Some were closer to the floor and the bass improved unfairly as a result.

    In the end, I came close to going with Rokit 7's and staying reasonable, but I lost myself listening to the Adam A7V's and bought two of them.

    JBL 305P mkII
    It was my least favored option of all the monitors in the room. Just not terribly impressive technicals, kinda wonk cohesion, and kinda crunchy and artificial. I had heard a lot about these and I was not impressed, but then again, I had probably expected too much from $240/pair 5" speakers.

    JBL 308P mkII
    Same signature as the 305P but actually good. Quite detailed especially in the bass, realistic timbre with good instrument separation, good air with sparkly highs without being fatiguing. Good balance between laidback and lively. But huge. 16.5" tall and a foot deep, too much for my computer desk and the glossy black chassis is obnoxious, at least for my taste.

    Yamaha HS8
    Bright tilt with strong clarity in the highs, decent plankton, but not that bassy. Not sure how they were EQ'd, but all the Yamaha's seemed similar. Solid choice for classical music. Good cohesion, full sounding. Bit expensive, but attractive chassis

    Yamaha HS7 / HS5
    Everything the same as the HS8 but technicals, bass and fullness all drop off as you'd expect as the size shrinks.

    KRK Rokit 8 Generation 5
    Wonderful, lively forward mid range. Non-fatiguing signature, party mode of all of the options, very fun. The issue is the total technical performance is sorta mid, cohesion is a hair off, some hollowness, highs have some crunch. Bass sorta weak and loose for an 8", still kinda limpdick even with EQ +2dB. Still, I really like KRK speakers because of the fun factor. Slightly above average in price but reasonable.

    KRK Rokit 7 / Rokit 5
    Rokit 7 has the same lively mids as the 8 and seemed more cohesive at times despite being smaller and a little crunchier. The Rokit 5 is a little too crunchy and small sounding, but I'd still pick it over the 305P, but understand if others wouldn't.

    Presonus Eris Studio 8"
    Dark tilt, this is the HD650 of the bunch with all the mid bass. Very laidback, full sounding, and cohesive but kinda veiled. Detail takes a back seat and there's not all that much separation. Transients are pretty slow. Still, preposterously easy to listen to. This and a Scotch would go well. Price is very good if you want this sound.

    Kali LP6 v2
    If I didn't know someone's preferences and their budget was tight, I might tell them to pickup these. This 6.5" is well balanced, better than average bass response, and generally good technicals. It's not necessarily the blackest or best separation or highest clarity but detail is still good. It's much darker than the JBL 308P but not as dark as the Presonus Eris 8, so it seemed like a good middle ground between signatures.

    Adam Audio A7V
    Different weight class than rest of the shit on this list. Everything that's good about the other speakers with few or none of the drawbacks. These deserve to be compared to Genelec and Neumann. Signature wise, we have loads of Genelec at work and the A7V's are more fun to listen to, but I'd prefer to mix on Genelec's which spotlight defects. The Adam has lots of plankton and blistering fast transients. Without EQ, the highs are sibilant, reminiscent of an unmodded HD800, but you can easily cure with two button pushes to tilt things darker. Vocals and mids soar with lively realism and give a superb sense of flow and dynamics. Bass doesn't hit quite as low as some of the 8" speakers but it's competitive and integrates cohesively. Balanced, nuanced, and manages both laidback and lively qualities. Has advanced features like you can upload detailed EQ curves directly to the speakers over wired ethernet. Smaller than any of the 8" monitors at 7". You get what you pay for.
     
    • Like Like x 7
    • Agreed, ditto, +1 Agreed, ditto, +1 x 1
    • List
    Last edited: Dec 13, 2024
  16. penguins

    penguins Friend, formerly known as fp627

    Pyrate
    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2018
    Likes Received:
    3,648
    Trophy Points:
    113
    Location:
    SouthernCA
    Had a similar adventure last year or earlier this year when I got my desktops. Agree with most of your impressions. I will say I liked the sound of the A7V the best out of all of the above as well but I couldn't get over the amount of background / white noise they had (maybe not particularly high on an absolute scale, but high to me where I would use them).

    The Kali felt like a safe choice all around that I wanted to like, but something I couldn't place my finger on felt "really missing" from their sound, even when accounting for the demo setting, etc. Otherwise, yes, KRK 7 and HS8 were the good choices without any major flaws, just with very different sounds.
     
  17. roshambo123

    roshambo123 Friend

    Pyrate Contributor
    Joined:
    May 26, 2018
    Likes Received:
    3,648
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    Definitely sins of omission thing. Nothing wrong but nothing so right that you take notice.
     
    • Agreed, ditto, +1 Agreed, ditto, +1 x 1
    • List
  18. GoldfishX

    GoldfishX Almost "Made"

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2015
    Likes Received:
    400
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Happy to see those impressions of both the latest KRK and HS8. I remember doing a similar tour a LONG time ago. Hated the HS8 after about 30 seconds, ended up buying the KRK's and returning them. This was the path that led me to my current Audioengine 6's. The temptation to dabble in powered monitors hits every now and then, but the path from the Audioengines is probably...bigger. Much bigger.
     
  19. roshambo123

    roshambo123 Friend

    Pyrate Contributor
    Joined:
    May 26, 2018
    Likes Received:
    3,648
    Trophy Points:
    93
    Location:
    Los Angeles
    What didn't you like?
     
  20. GoldfishX

    GoldfishX Almost "Made"

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2015
    Likes Received:
    400
    Trophy Points:
    63
    Was a LONG time ago, but they ended up being too bright in my setup for regular use. I thought they sounded pretty good at the Guitar Center. I DO think I had some power issues at the time, either with them or with the source, but I ended up switching to headphones for a time, then finally settled on the Audioengines, once they went on sale.
     

Share This Page