But why tho?
Mainly priorities. 3D stage, clarity, ability to render binaural excellently and tonal accuracy make ER4SR pretty amazing and all-rounders.
Andromeda disappoints, first tone is unacceptable - harsh treble spike, rolled off upper treble, bloated midbass that is not of high quality. Stage and detail is decent though. But Katana is bigger and tonally what Andro is supposed to be IMHO, and I think it's more dynamic.
Thanks. I don't care for Andromeda myself, so when someone says they don't like it either I find it interesting to discover why. Especially if they think another product is better.
Other folks have done direct comparisons andro to katana and had the same result with the katana being clearly superior.
What is your source? Andros are very OI dependent, they could easily sound bad with the wrong pairing.
@Merrick Interesting. I was using my Samsung Galaxy S8, but I also tried on the ZDT Jr. low Z output. Didn't notice a huge change.
Still I feel it won't satisfy me unless bass quality is improved or at least quantity reduced, as well as that treble glare and lack of air on top. My preferences are too specific and I had too many expectstions before trying them.
Separate names with a comma.