E_Schaaf

B for opens, A for closed.

A, plus stage depth & localization. (can that even be done?)

unabashedly team A.
Then again...what music are we listening to??

Not seeing myself letting go of the Lyr3 either, a great all rounder imo and i suspect the Lyr+ is the same.

Different not necessarily better.

For some of the more esoteric transducers I've been playing with, I simply want something that doesn't clip when Valhalla 2 can't hack it

TIL not everyone can do this!

Now I need to know: can you voluntarily pop your ears "in either direction"? What I mean is: can you pop your ears so that everything gets louder and also pop your ears so that everything gets quieter?

I always thought everyone can do this, too. I theoretically can do it for as long as I want, though just now was the first time I did it for about 30s. It actually becomes exhausting after a while. :)

Jotunheim, balanced, high gain? If that's not enough, the raggy has more power and even higher gain.

I suppose it's not *that* far off from a K1000 in terms of the load...

Dartzeel NHB 108

Contrasting that with Zach's post on another profile post, shows where two different companies are in terms of company maturity and what they face when having to price their products. Excellent timing on peering behind the curtain in this biz.

You may have subsidized the R&D costs as hobby interests in the past. Going forward R&D have real costs in both time and money.

Thanks @E_Schaaf. Ordered. I just can't shrug off an FR like that. It's a very cute girl giving you the eye.

Of course there's still plenty of narrow-stroke variation with incremental adjustment of various parameters and different parts used within the same design. I suppose this line of thinking could apply to amps and DACs as well, but my knowledge there is too rudimentary to know what I would and wouldn't want based on a visual inspection.

I always love digging deeper into the 'why' of how sound quality is created, even if it's a matter of guesswork and subjective polling until the patterns become clear... seeking this kind of insight is what keeps me going, that feeling of discovery and puzzle-solving.

The shape of sound

Mini S for semi-open! I'll be selling these soon and they'll be at TX meet too. I tried revamping the original Open design several ways but decided I liked this config with some back damping and over ear pads the best even though it sounds quite different :)

Happy Birthday!!

Happy birthday!

You should send this to your dad.. https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-covid-19-could-hit-you-harder-with-each-reinfection

Four times! I think this is the highest number I've heard yet.

Seems on par with almost everyone in rual TN.

Is the S12 current preferred mod config simply partial micropore nozzle coverage or something more intricate? I have a lot of fibrous filters similar to micropore tape of varying density, and also a bunch of different meshes too. Looking forward to tweaking. I guess it's settled haha

Yeah all you have to do is cover the back half of the nozzle with micropore tape. The transformation from stock is pretty astounding. It corrects all the problems.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r-zbsRbxDms

you might come up with something better too! I'm pretty happy with this though

I like a KISS approach, ill definitely try with your config first and see how it goes :)

A lot of misconceptions about this probably stem from the fact that enclosure info is almost never really explored in spec sheets or marketing copy outside of 'more open', 'more closed', etc. It's easy to assume most differences heard between two different headphones are due to the drivers, but in reality drivers are just a small part of the bigger picture and there are dozens of confounding variables.

Have measured and heard earpads that make 15dB differences in FR and distortion with the same enclosure and driver as well as reduce or increase ringing by several ms. As an analogy, imagine listening to two sets of different speakers in a well treated room, and then comparing again inside a solid concrete box for a room. Room differences will be more dramatic than speaker differences.

Our audio world suffers from a bad mixture of materials bias, eg plastic is bad, whatever, regardless of actual properties and engineering, and anthropomorphism eg silver sounds bright.

Inversely, a Drop HD6xx at $220 in 2022 would be about ~$145 in 2004.

When it came out, they had it on a pedestal at Circuity City. It was the most expensive pair they sold. It felt unreachable even at $550. It wasn't until they came down to sub K701 prices before I could afford one.

I just came back from a live show, and their was this drone band that was Avant-garde but it was loud and passionate, and on the main stage they had a 10 piece band full of stiff players and it was so boring rigid. Some vosco, bosanova thing. Nothing about it stuck out to me other than decision paralysis because the band was too big and it seemed they had no real direction in a huge open space.

While the Drone band was dynamic in a concreate room, absolutely incredible.

So what do artists intend? Do they all have intention or simply playing along.

And what about the producer and the mastering engineer? Are they chopped liver? They probably more time and care in making things sound good.

It'll be a worlds first! The manufacturer repeatedly tried to dissuade me, citing the strength advantage of NdFeB, but my curiosity had to be satiated...

Have you thought about playing with multi-magnet arrangement like what we see on some tweeters and some woofers? I think the idea here is to gain higher magnetic flux with smaller magnet size which would be appreciated to headphones especially small headphones like your mini'es. e.g. http://www.troelsgravesen.dk/OVAL-1/ellipticor-4-1800.jpg AND https://europe-audio.com/img/Data/HQ/d3004-662000-1.png

@nishan99 yes! I already have several of those as well, there was some parallel development. The dual magnetic drivers hopefully will launch in sale ready headphones in the next month or two. They sound amazing and are an ETA exclusive :)

Pioneer was onto something. Those old Pioneers can sound exceptional, end-game exceptional.

SBAF is getting one in a month. How’s that for the magic gearmaster touch? :p

@rhythmdevils you've still got it!

I passed it by at CanJam....I'll have to sign up for the loaner....nice!!

E_Schaaf where'd you get your V60? Is it possible the jack is OMTP not CTIA? Maybe pick up a converter too: https://www.amazon.com/Universal-3-5mm-Earphone-Converter-Adapter/dp/B07Q8GLYW3

The adapter @Biodegraded linked didn't work, same issue. I notice that there will also be no sound when just one of the sides of the headphone is unplugged and I reinsert the jack, but when both are plugged in, both channels are active. Seems the positive leads are being bridged and grounding doesn't work unless both leads are active???

Kinda seems like the pinout on the socket is 100% backwards

Re:thinnest pads possible. Maybe that's why I enjoy the Porta Pros and KSC75 so much. Having the driver that close realy just puts you right into the music.

Closed designs are efficient and yes make amps less important. Exotic materials are for looks/aesthetics, which people do buy with their eyes. 600/650 are damped, but I would not say over-damped. This is why you need a good amp to get through the damped haze. And lastly, more revealing signal chain will reveal how bad recordings are. Lower top end makes things sound more "pleasant" - Harman already figured this out.

Good that you have worked out your personal preferences. Keep perspective that these may not necessarily represent universal Trvths. However sharing provides yet another important data point for all.

ORTF will provide decent results even if the room acoustics are not so great.

I wanted to do ORTF, but the Schoeps CMC641 pair are supercardioid, I thought it'd lack center fill so went for XY

I've used both CMC62 and CMC641 in ORTF to great effect. If room acoustics are good, CMC62, otherwise CMC641.